
Play therapy is to children what counseling is to adults. A child's primary language is not verbal. Toys are their words, and play is their language. Children's behaviors are frequently an expression of what's going on inside them. Play therapy gives children an opportunity to make sense of their thoughts, feelings, and life experiences in a way that is comfortable, safe, and non-threatening. In the process, children also frequently learn to develop greater trust in themselves, their abilities, and their relationships.
Play therapy is an evidence-based approach for preventing and resolving children's psychosocial difficulties. Studies have consistently demonstrated it's effectiveness with a broad range of children's problems.
In the process of growing up, children's problems are often compounded by the inability of adults in their lives to understand or to respond to what children are feeling and attempting to communicate. What many adults think children are saying, they aren't. What we think they are hearing, they aren't. Thus children often feel isolated with their problems, shut off from the significant adults in their lives whom they perceive as not caring because these adults seem not to understand.
We hear a lot today about the communications gap that exists between adults and teenagers. The real communications gap exists between adults and children. We wouldn't have a communications gap with teenagers if we adults had learned how to communicate with them when they were children.
The communications gap we have with children is widened as a result of adult's insistence that children adopt that means of expression commonly used by adults. Children are trying desperately to make themselves understood. However, they are often not successful through entirely verbal means.
Play is to the child what verbalization is to the adult. It is a medium for expressing feelings, exploring relationships, and self-fulfillment. In short, it is the child's natural medium of self-expression. Most adults are able to put their feelings, frustrations, anxieties, and personal problems into some form of verbal expression. Children, though, often experience considerable difficulty when required to delve into their problems through reliance on a similar verbal process. However, in an understanding, caring, and permissive relationship that says to children, "This is a safe place," they will play out their feelings in a manner that is somewhat similar to the ways adults talk out their problems. Play therapy, therefore, is to the child what counseling or psychotherapy is to the adult.
For most children, play therapy is a unique experience where an accepting adult is truly interested in understanding him. The counselor is sensitive to the needs and feelings of the child expressed in play or verbally, and responds with real understanding in such a way that the child is aided in his struggle to be himself and to understand. This encounter with an adult who emphatically understands and really cares about the child as a person and an individual helps the child to explore with greater openness all of his feelings about himself, other children, adults, and his sometimes bewildering little world. This exploration is undertaken by the child because he is allowed to explore through that means most appropriate for him- play.
Landreth, G. (October 1972), Why play therapy? Guidelines, 21: Texas Counseling Association.
Child therapists are ethically-bound and accountable to their clients to provide treatments that are most effective; however they have received little help from the scientific community to guide their efforts. Historically, the efficacy of psychological interventions for children has been a basis for controversy and debate among mental health professionals. Not until recently has this issue received national attention, with the U. S. Public Health Service (2000) emphasizing the critical need for early intervention and empirically-validated treatments that are designed specifically to meet children's unique needs.
Play therapy is a developmentally responsive modality uniquely suited for children to help prevent or resolve psychosocial difficulties and achieve optimal growth and development. Developmentally, children lack the cognitive ability to meaningfully communicate their thoughts, feelings, and experiences through the abstract means of verbal language. The concrete objects (toys, art, etc.) and other play-based experiences provided in play therapy afford children an age-appropriate and emotionally safe means to express their difficult experiences. For these reasons, play therapy is currently practiced by thousands of clinicians to treat their young clients; however the scientific community has been less enamored, criticizing this modality's lack of an adequate research base to support its practice. Proving the effectiveness of play therapy to third party payors, the legal community, mental health professionals, school administrators, parents, and critics of play therapy is necessary for the acceptance of play therapy as a viable intervention for the growing number of children experiencing social-emotional and/or behavioral difficulties that need responsive services.
Meta-analytic methodology allows the researcher to analyze the effects of a treatment, in this case play therapy, by combining the results of individual studies, thus overcoming the limitations of small sample sizes often found in outcome research in the mental health field. The authors conducted a meta-analysis of 93 controlled outcome studies, published 1953 to 2000, to assess the overall efficacy of play therapy and to determine factors that might impact its effectiveness. The overall mean treatment effect was 0.80 standard deviations, considered a large treatment effect. Further analysis revealed that effects were more positive for humanistic than for non-humanistic treatments, and that utilizing parents in their child's play therapy produced larger overall treatment effects than play therapy conducted by a professional. Play therapy appeared equally effective across age, gender, presenting issue, and clinical vs. psychotherapy, and further suggest that doubts about the efficacy of play therapy can be laid to rest.
| Total Studies | 93 |
| Total Subjects | 3263 |
| Mean # of Sessions | 16 |
| Mean Age | 7.0 |
| Gender of Subjects | 2/3 male, 1/3 female |
| EFFECT SIZE FOR THE TOTAL (93 STUDIES) | ES=.80 P<.001 |
| * Effect Size for Play Therapy by Professional (n=67) | ES=.72 p<.05 |
| * Effect Size for Play Therapy by Paraprofessionals (n=26) (Filial therapy studies conducted by parents, teachers, mentors - mostly parents) | ES=1.05 p<.05 |
| * Effect Size for the Parent only Filial Therapy (n=22) | ES=1.15 p<.05 |
According to Cohen (1977), d = .2 represents a small effect size; d = .5 represents a medium effect size; and d = .8 represents a large effect size; therefore, the results of the meta-analysis of play therapy outcome research studies (n=94) reveal a large treatment effect for children receiving play therapy intervention when compared to children receiving no treatment or a non-play therapy intervention.
Note: This information provides a brief summary of the following publication: Bratton, S., Ray, D., Rhine, T., & Jones, L. (Aug. 2005). The efficacy of play therapy with children: A Meta-analytic review of the outcome research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(4).